Enterprise Architecture Management

Which applications will you actually need?

Discuss your priorities
Jürgen Leitner and Emanuel Stadler standing, leaning over a tablet

IN BRIEF

Enterprise Architecture Management (EAM) shows how business capabilities, applications, data and technology connect. It supports decisions about investment, simplification and the future shape of your IT landscape.

When to involve us.

When applications duplicate functions, integrations are difficult to understand, modernisation lacks a target picture or cloud decisions are made apart from the rest of the architecture, a decision-oriented architecture view creates clarity.

We start with the decision, not an exhaustive inventory. Together, we identify the relevant capabilities, systems and dependencies. Options are compared by value, risk and transition effort.

What the work produces.

We agree on the scope around your goals, starting point and available capacity. The following elements illustrate what an engagement can include.

WHAT WE ADDRESS

  • Enterprise Architecture Management (EAM)
  • Business capability and application maps
  • Target architecture with integration and cloud principles
  • Application assessment and rationalisation

POTENTIAL OUTPUTS

A shared view of your landscape, architecture guardrails and a roadmap to reduce duplication and dependencies.

A focused starting point.

Existing application lists, integration overviews and modernisation plans. Business and technical owners help clarify actual usage, dependencies and critical transitions.

The question first. Then the scope.

The first conversation clarifies the objective, deliverables and people involved. We agree whether the engagement covers design, pilot support or technical implementation, who takes on each task and how the deliverables will be assessed.

Discuss a starting point by email

Do we need to document the entire IT landscape first?

No. A complete inventory can consume substantial effort before improving a single decision. It often makes more sense to start with a specific question: which applications should be consolidated, or which dependencies could jeopardise an initiative? Capture the relevant capabilities, applications, data flows and ownership for that purpose. Expand the documentation as its value becomes clear. Appropriate detail, reliable information and responsibility for maintenance matter more than volume. An architecture tool alone does not create a dependable basis for decisions.

Last updated:

Related

What would you like to move forward?

Let’s talk